In the UK whenever the public are unhappy with new rules, options, etc, the government reply is often, "We want to give people choices."
Son came back with a difficult choice to make last Friday.
He was selected to play hockey (Unihoc) against another school on Monday afternoon 2.30pm to 4pm. But he also had to attend a full orchestra practice on Monday 3.45pm to 4.30pm.
He most definitely preferred to do orchestra, but he also desperately wanted to play hockey. (I haven't seen him play, but son thinks he is good. His paternal grandfather nearly got to Oxford on the basis of his hockey playing, so potentially son could be an ace hockey player. [She stifles a giggle.])
Life was easy, then he got more and more upset that he would have to miss hockey. I offered to talk to his teachers to see if we could (1) leave the hockey game early, or (2) start orchestra late, etc, but he didn't feel comfortable about it.
The teachers only live down the road. We could have knocked on their doors for advice. But it will not be fair to bother them on weekends, surely.
So, amidst tears, he decided that he'd go for orchestra and I had to say 'no' on the form to be sent back to the Games Master.
When I picked son up after orchestra, the Music Director then told us in the friendliest way possible: if there is a clash between sport and music, sport takes precedence.
Son would have been excused from orchestra. No trouble at all.
Sometimes it is much better when we are not subjected to the need to choose.
No need for all those tears, had we known. Never mind, we learn.